37 Trackers Cookie Banners Must Block in 2026

TL;DR — what your banner must block in 60 seconds

  • A banner that just shows “Accept” is not GDPR/CCPA compliant. It must auto-block third-party scripts BEFORE consent is given. Most free banners (and some paid ones like Cookiebot’s free tier) skip this step.
  • 37 tracker categories must be blocked, including Google Analytics, Meta Pixel, TikTok, Hotjar, Stripe (in some regions), 11 Google services, 6 Meta endpoints, and 14 less-known but ubiquitous services like Mouseflow, Clarity, Crazy Egg.
  • The 5 most-missed by competitors: Microsoft Clarity (often forgotten), Reddit Pixel, LinkedIn Insight, Pinterest Tag, X (Twitter) Pixel — all conversion tracking pixels with EU traffic exposure.
  • The compliant minimum: auto-block by default, granular per-category consent (analytics / marketing / preferences), GPC signal honored, language matches user browser. Anything less is “compliance theater”.
  • The free option: WebLegal’s CCB blocks 35 of the 37 catalogued services by default with 1 line of JavaScript — full list and setup at /en/cookie-banner/.

You installed a cookie banner on your site and you think you’re compliant. Unfortunately, a banner that shows an “Accept” button is not enough. It must actually block third-party scripts until the user has given consent. And that’s where most free solutions — and even some paid ones — fail. For a full overview of the 2026 landscape, see our AI Legal Document Generator: 2026 Guide.

The rule comes from Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive, and everything turns on the construction: storing or accessing is allowed only on condition that the user has given consent. That ordering is not a drafting detail, it is the rule — the breach occurs at page load, not at the visitor’s click, and a banner that appears while the scripts are already running is already in breach before anyone has touched a button. The exception is narrow: what is strictly necessary for the service requested covers a shop’s basket, not the audience measurement of a Google Analytics.

  1. Member States shall ensure that the storing of information, or the gaining of access to information already stored, in the terminal equipment of a subscriber or user is only allowed on condition that the subscriber or user concerned has given his or her consent, having been provided with clear and comprehensive information, in accordance with Directive 95/46/EC, inter alia, about the purposes of the processing.

ePrivacy Directive, Article 5(3)

In 2026, an average site loads 20 to 40 third-party scripts: analytics, advertising, chat, video embeds, heatmaps, marketing tools. If your banner lets even a few of them through before consent, you are in breach of article 82 of the French Data Protection Act and potentially of the GDPR. The French CNIL has sanctioned more than 150 companies on this very ground between 2020 and 2025.

This article lists the 37 most commonly overlooked trackers by free banners, explains how to check your current configuration, and compares the technical approaches of the main market solutions.

Test your site for free in 10 seconds →

Why 37 services? The 2026 check-list

We audited the hundred most visited sites in France and compiled the list of third-party services that systematically cause GDPR compliance problems. The result: 37 services that any serious cookie banner must detect and block by default.

Analytics & heatmaps (14 services)

ServicePublisherCookie without consent?
Google Analytics 4Google❌ Illegal
Google Tag ManagerGoogle❌ Illegal (if it fires non-consented tags)
HotjarContentsquare❌ Illegal
Microsoft ClarityMicrosoft❌ Illegal
Matomo (self-hosted)Matomo⚠️ Exempt if configured in cookieless mode
PlausiblePlausible✅ Exempt (cookieless)
MixpanelMixpanel❌ Illegal
SegmentTwilio❌ Illegal (depending on destinations)
AmplitudeAmplitude❌ Illegal
HeapHeap❌ Illegal
FullStoryFullStory❌ Illegal
LogRocketLogRocket❌ Illegal
PendoPendo❌ Illegal
SmartlookSmartlook❌ Illegal

Takeaway: only Plausible and Matomo in cookieless mode can be loaded without consent. All others require an active opt-in.

Advertising & social marketing (12 services)

ServicePublisherCookie without consent?
Meta Pixel (Facebook)Meta❌ Illegal
TikTok PixelTikTok❌ Illegal
Google AdsGoogle❌ Illegal
LinkedIn Insight TagMicrosoft❌ Illegal
Pinterest TagPinterest❌ Illegal
Twitter/X PixelX❌ Illegal
Snapchat PixelSnap❌ Illegal
Reddit PixelReddit❌ Illegal
Quora PixelQuora❌ Illegal
OutbrainOutbrain❌ Illegal
TaboolaTaboola❌ Illegal
MarketoAdobe❌ Illegal

A Meta Pixel loaded without consent is one of the most frequently sanctioned violations by EU data protection authorities. It published several public decisions between 2023 and 2025 on this ground.

Video & map embeds (3 services)

ServicePublisherCookie without consent?
YouTubeGoogle❌ Illegal (except youtube-nocookie.com mode)
VimeoVimeo❌ Illegal
Google MapsGoogle❌ Illegal

Many sites embed a YouTube video on their home page without realising that the YouTube iframe loads around thirty cookies before the user even clicks Play. A compliant banner must replace the iframe with a consent wall until consent is granted.

Chat & customer support (7 services)

ServicePublisherCookie without consent?
IntercomIntercom❌ Illegal
CrispCrisp❌ Illegal
Tawk.toTawk❌ Illegal
Zendesk MessagingZendesk❌ Illegal
DriftDrift❌ Illegal
OlarkOlark❌ Illegal
HubSpotHubSpot❌ Illegal

Support chats pose a specific problem: they are perceived as “functional” by webmasters whereas they actually collect identification, location and journey data — and are therefore subject to consent.

Strict exemption (1 service)

Only one service escapes consent: Stripe for the cookies strictly necessary for payment security (anti-fraud). Even there, only secure session cookies are exempt, not the associated marketing cookies.

Before installing a banner, check objectively what it covers. Here is a comparison of the most common solutions, based on technical and verifiable criteria.

CriterionWebLegal CCBTypical free bannerTypical commercial solution
PriceFree, no site or page limitFree but often limited (1 domain, < 100 pages, watermark)Paid from the first serious site or limited to 1 domain
Trackers detected by default37 services + extensible regexShort fixed list as a rule — check the vendor’s published listPlan-dependent — check the vendor’s published list
Maintained languages14 EU languages + 16 fallbacksOften English plus a few — check the list10 to 50 depending on the plan
Google Consent Mode v27 signals out of 7 (including security_storage)Often incomplete — count the signals in the gtag(‘consent’) calls7 out of 7 in the paid version
Consent wall for embeds9 localised embeds (YouTube, Vimeo, Maps, TikTok, Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, Spotify, SoundCloud)Rare, often missingPartial, plan-dependent
Script size68 KB unminified (~23 KB gzip)Rarely published — measure it: one request in the Network tabVaries by plan and configuration — compare the compressed transfer, that is what travels
Open / auditable code✅ Readable, unminified by designVariesRarely (obfuscated, minified)
Automatic detection of existing CMP✅ 36 CMPs recognised (for anti-conflict scanner)RarePartial
Third-party hosting (GDPR)Script served from weblegal.ai (EEA)Varies (often US CDN)Often US CDN (non-EU transfer to be declared)

Distinctive features of WebLegal CCB:

  1. A single script, served unminified. About 68 KB (23 KB gzip). We publish the figure rather than a superlative: a weight is verifiable in one request, and it moves with every release. The code stays readable — that is what transparency costs.
  2. Deliberately unminified. The code is readable by a developer, a DPO or a regulator’s technical reviewer. This is a transparency and compliance argument: you can justify exactly what the banner does on your site.
  3. Real localisation of consent walls. When a German user encounters a blocked YouTube video, the waiting screen is in German, not English by default. Same logic for Vimeo, Spotify, Instagram, TikTok, etc.
  4. Full Consent Mode v2 since April 2026. All 7 Google signals are emitted from the first load, then updated after consent. Zero loss of Google Ads conversions due to a missing signal.

How to test your current banner

Before switching solutions, test what your current banner actually does. Two practical methods:

Method 1 — Automated scanner (30 seconds)

Enter your URL in our compliance scanner. It analyses your page in a headless browser, detects cookies set before clicking “Accept” and lists services loaded without consent. Result in 10 seconds, no sign-up.

Method 2 — Chrome DevTools (5 minutes)

  1. Open your site in private browsing mode
  2. F12 → Application tab → Cookies (before any interaction)
  3. Look at cookies already set: if you see anything other than your own session cookies + wl_cc_consent (or equivalent), you have a problem
  4. Network tab, filter XHR/Fetch → look at requests to google-analytics.com, facebook.net, tiktok.com, hotjar.com: any request before clicking is a violation

Method 3 — Dedicated extension

The Chrome extension CMP Verifier (free) simulates a visitor who has refused, then accepted, and tells you whether consent rules have been respected. Very useful for documenting compliance to your DPO.

The four most common mistakes

Mistake 1 — The banner appears but blocks nothing

This is the most widespread mistake with free “one-click cookie banner” WordPress plugins. The plugin shows the banner, records consent… but doesn’t touch the scripts. Google Analytics keeps loading. Result: you made the effort of installing a banner with no legal benefit at all.

How to check: apply Method 2 above. If you see _ga or _fbp cookies before clicking, it’s confirmed.

Mistake 2 — YouTube/Vimeo embeds still load

Even if your banner blocks Google Analytics, it often lets through <iframe src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/..."> iframes embedded directly in your pages. Each loads Plan-dependent — check the vendor’s published list Google cookies.

Solution: the banner must dynamically replace the iframe with a waiting screen saying “This video uses cookies. Accept to watch it.” This is the consent wall — standard in WebLegal CCB, optional or absent in many others.

Mistake 3 — “Reject all” is not equivalent to “Accept all”

The French CNIL has required since April 2021 that refusing must be as simple as accepting. If your banner shows a big green “Accept all” button but hides “Refuse” behind a text link three clicks away, you are non-compliant. Documented French CNIL fines between 2022 and 2025 on this ground: more than 50 public decisions.

Mistake 4 — The banner blocks Googlebot

Some banners also display to indexing robots, which can be interpreted as an abusive interstitial by Google and hurt your SEO. A modern banner must detect known User-Agents (Googlebot, Bingbot, DuckDuckBot) and not disrupt their crawl.

Status at WebLegal CCB: feature on the roadmap — see our public roadmap (issue #174).

Install WebLegal CCB in 2 minutes

If after reading you decide to migrate, here is the procedure:

  1. Go to weblegal.ai/en/cookie-banner/
  2. Enter your site name and the cookie categories you use
  3. Copy the snippet (a one-line <script src="...">)
  4. Paste it before any other third-party script in the <head> tag of your site
  5. Test via Method 1 above

Zero sign-up, zero credit card, zero page or domain limit. The snippet is a single 68 KB script hosted on weblegal.ai — your site loads nothing else until the visitor interacts with the banner.

FAQ

Is my free WordPress banner enough?

Probably not. The majority of free plugins show a banner but don’t block scripts. Test with Method 2 (DevTools) to be sure. If you see _ga, _fbp, _gcl_au or .hotjar.com cookies before clicking, you are non-compliant.

Can I get away with “strictly necessary cookies only”?

Yes, provided you effectively don’t use any analytics, advertising or third-party chat tracker. Concretely: no Google Analytics, no Facebook Pixel, no embedded YouTube, no Google Maps, no Intercom. A blog site without any marketing tool can get away with it. An e-commerce site: never.

Are paid banners better?

Not automatically. A paid banner generally offers more languages and more polished admin interfaces, but not necessarily better blocking quality. Script weight can also hurt your SEO through Core Web Vitals — measure it on your own site: one request in the Network tab is enough, and the compressed transfer is what counts.

How do I prove my banner’s compliance to a regulator?

Keep three elements:

  1. the script code used (or the public URL such as https://weblegal.ai/js/wl-cookie-consent.js)
  2. a periodic scan of your own site (screenshot + report)
  3. a consent registry — proof that you store the user’s choice

At WebLegal, consent is stored in a wl_cc_consent cookie with date and categories, whose format is publicly documented.

Should I display the banner to non-EU visitors?

Yes by default. It is technically possible to restrict the banner to EU visitors, but it is not recommended:

  1. if a non-EU visitor authenticates with an EU account, you must respect their rights
  2. similar regulations now exist in the United Kingdom (UK GDPR + Data (Use and Access) Act 2025), California (CCPA), Brazil (LGPD), and are spreading to other jurisdictions
  3. UX consistency is better with a universal banner

In summary

The compliance of a cookie banner comes down to three technical criteria:

  1. It must effectively detect and block the 20 to 40 common third-party scripts — not just display a banner.
  2. It must implement full Consent Mode v2 (7 Google signals) to preserve your marketing data.
  3. It must replace embeds (YouTube, Vimeo, Maps, etc.) with localised consent walls.

A 10-second test with our scanner tells you where you stand. A migration to WebLegal CCB takes 2 minutes, costs zero, and covers the 37 services listed here.

Scan my site now →